1964 Morgan 4 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1097 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Morgan 4 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Morgan | Cadillac |
Model | 4 | CTS |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2880 mm |