1964 Morgan 4 vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 1656 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Morgan 4 | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Morgan | Nissan |
Model | 4 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2316 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2640 mm |