1964 Morgan 4 vs. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,340 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Morgan 4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1964 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 840 kg more than 1964 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1964 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Morgan 4 | 2012 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Morgan | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 4 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2500 mm |
