1964 Morgan Plus 4 Plus vs. 2006 Nissan M
To start off, 2006 Nissan M is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morgan Plus 4 Plus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morgan Plus 4 Plus would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Nissan M is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Morgan Plus 4 Plus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Morgan Plus 4 Plus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Nissan M, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan M (462 Nm) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Morgan Plus 4 Plus. (174 Nm). This means 2006 Nissan M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Morgan Plus 4 Plus. 2006 Nissan M has automatic transmission and 1964 Morgan Plus 4 Plus has manual transmission. 1964 Morgan Plus 4 Plus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Nissan M will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Morgan Plus 4 Plus | 2006 Nissan M | |
| Make | Morgan | Nissan |
| Model | Plus 4 Plus | M |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2138 cc | 4500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 462 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1830 mm |
