1964 Morris Mini Moke vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Mini Moke. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Mini Moke would be higher. At 848 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Morris Mini Moke is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi Minica weights approximately 60 kg more than 1964 Morris Mini Moke.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Morris Mini Moke | 2002 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Morris | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Mini Moke | Minica |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3050 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1310 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2350 mm |
