1964 Morris Mini Moke vs. 2009 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Mini Moke. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Mini Moke would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (233 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Mini Moke.
Because 2009 Toyota 4Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Toyota 4Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Morris Mini Moke, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota 4Runner (266 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Morris Mini Moke.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Morris Mini Moke | 2009 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Morris | Toyota |
Model | Mini Moke | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 233 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 266 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3050 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1310 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2610 mm |