1964 Morris Mini Moke vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Mini Moke. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Mini Moke would be higher. At 4,194 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (391 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 357 more horse power than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 481 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Morris Mini Moke.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Morris Mini Moke | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Morris | Jaguar |
Model | Mini Moke | XJ |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 391 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 541 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3050 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3040 mm |