1964 Morris Oxford vs. 2008 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2008 Smart Roadster is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Morris Oxford is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Smart Roadster (110 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Morris Oxford. (81 Nm). This means 2008 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Morris Oxford. 2008 Smart Roadster has automatic transmission and 1964 Morris Oxford has manual transmission. 1964 Morris Oxford will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Smart Roadster will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Morris Oxford | 2008 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Morris | Smart |
Model | Oxford | Roadster |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 81 Nm | 110 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 35 L |