1964 Morris Traveller vs. 1992 Renault Clio
To start off, 1992 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Traveller. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Traveller would be higher. At 1,107 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Renault Clio (48 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1964 Morris Traveller. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Traveller. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Morris Traveller weights approximately 20 kg more than 1992 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 81 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Morris Traveller | 1992 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Morris | Renault |
| Model | Traveller | Clio |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
| Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1107 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 48 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 81 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
