1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 265 (82 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Nissan Bluebird | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Bluebird | 265 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1188 cc | 2315 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 82 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |
