1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 1983 Volvo 240
To start off, 1983 Volvo 240 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Volvo 240 (122 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 240 weights approximately 344 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Volvo 240 (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1983 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Bluebird | 1983 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | 240 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2660 mm |