1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,189 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru R2 (62 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 96 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Subaru R2 (103 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Subaru R2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
| Make | Nissan | Subaru |
| Model | Bluebird | R2 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2370 mm |
