1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 890 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
| Model | Bluebird | CTS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1188 cc | 3173 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2750 mm |
