1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2005 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2005 Smart ForFour is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,332 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Smart ForFour (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Smart ForFour weights approximately 70 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2005 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Bluebird | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1188 cc | 1332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2510 mm |
