1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1128 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Bluebird | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1188 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2028 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 5550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3270 mm |
