1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (155 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet HHR weights approximately 465 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet HHR (203 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Bluebird | HHR |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1431 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4475 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1603 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2629 mm |