1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo (103 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 447 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Bluebird | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1188 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 103 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1347 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2610 mm |