1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C3 (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 300 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Citroen C3 (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Nissan | Citroen |
Model | Bluebird | C3 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2470 mm |