1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (322 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Bluebird | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 322 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5171 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 3193 mm |
