1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Subaru Outback Sport
To start off, 2010 Subaru Outback Sport is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Subaru Outback Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Outback Sport (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback Sport should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Subaru Outback Sport weights approximately 510 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Subaru Outback Sport | |
Make | Nissan | Subaru |
Model | Bluebird | Outback Sport |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1188 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4415 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2619 mm |