1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2010 Volvo S60
To start off, 2010 Volvo S60 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S60 (300 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S60 weights approximately 869 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2010 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | S60 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1188 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1769 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4623 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1483 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2776 mm |