1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 848 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Nissan | Cadillac |
| Model | Bluebird | CTS |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1188 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1748 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2880 mm |
