1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 771 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Bluebird | Equinox |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1737 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2858 mm |