1964 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,460 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 275 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Nissan Bluebird | 2012 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Bluebird | Clio |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1188 cc | 1460 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2580 mm |
