1964 Nissan Cedric vs. 1992 Holden Nova
To start off, 1992 Holden Nova is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Nova (81 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Nova should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 70 kg more than 1992 Holden Nova.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Holden Nova. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Holden Nova (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1992 Holden Nova will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Cedric | 1992 Holden Nova | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Cedric | Nova |
Year Released | 1964 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2440 mm |