1964 Nissan Cedric vs. 1996 Suzuki Escudo
To start off, 1996 Suzuki Escudo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Suzuki Escudo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Suzuki Escudo (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Suzuki Escudo should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 425 kg more than 1996 Suzuki Escudo.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Suzuki Escudo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Suzuki Escudo (156 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 1996 Suzuki Escudo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Cedric | 1996 Suzuki Escudo | |
Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
Model | Cedric | Escudo |
Year Released | 1964 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 156 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2370 mm |