1964 Nissan Cedric vs. 2006 Toyota Fortuner
To start off, 2006 Toyota Fortuner is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Fortuner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Fortuner (235 HP) has 175 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Fortuner should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Fortuner weights approximately 165 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota Fortuner (343 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2006 Toyota Fortuner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Cedric | 2006 Toyota Fortuner | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Fortuner |
Year Released | 1964 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 235 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 343 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2760 mm |