1964 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (525 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 465 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Audi R8 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (530 Nm @ 6500 RPM) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Cedric | R8 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 525 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 530 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1252 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2649 mm |