1964 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi (180 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 425 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Suzuki Kizashi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
Model | Cedric | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |