1964 NSU 1000 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 796 kg more than 1964 NSU 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Condor (158 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 NSU 1000. (72 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1964 NSU 1000 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | NSU | Toyota |
Model | 1000 | Condor |
Year Released | 1964 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 1998 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 72 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.6 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 650 kg | 1446 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 70 L |