1964 NSU Wankel Spider vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 NSU Wankel Spider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 NSU Wankel Spider would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1964 NSU Wankel Spider. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1964 NSU Wankel Spider.
Because 1964 NSU Wankel Spider is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 NSU Wankel Spider. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 NSU Wankel Spider. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 NSU Wankel Spider.
Compare all specifications:
1964 NSU Wankel Spider | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | NSU | Toyota |
Model | Wankel Spider | Matrix |
Year Released | 1964 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 497 cc | 2400 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2020 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 50 L |