1964 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 980 kg more than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | 1951 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Singer |
Model | Starfire | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 1964 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6965 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 47 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2320 mm |