1964 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 1966 Renault 4 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1966 Renault 4.
Because 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | 1966 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
| Model | Starfire | 4 |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 33 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 650 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2410 mm |
