1964 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 850 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Because 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Smart |
| Model | Starfire | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 1332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 970 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2510 mm |
