1964 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2002 Porsche Cayenne
To start off, 2002 Porsche Cayenne is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Porsche Cayenne weights approximately 425 kg more than 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 2002 Porsche Cayenne is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Porsche Cayenne will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2002 Porsche Cayenne | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Porsche |
Model | Starfire | Cayenne |
Year Released | 1964 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6965 cc | 4511 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 336 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 2245 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2860 mm |