1964 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 116 kg more than 2009 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
| Model | Starfire | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 362 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1704 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2838 mm |
