1964 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 764 kg more than 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Land Rover |
| Model | Starfire | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 375 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 2584 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2891 mm |
