1964 Oldsmobile Starfire vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 774 kg more than 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Oldsmobile Starfire | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Cadillac |
| Model | Starfire | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6965 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 397 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 2594 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2947 mm |
