1964 Opel Rekord vs. 1998 Rover Mini
To start off, 1998 Rover Mini is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Rover Mini (62 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1964 Opel Rekord. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini should accelerate faster than 1964 Opel Rekord. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Opel Rekord weights approximately 274 kg more than 1998 Rover Mini.
Because 1964 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover Mini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Opel Rekord (108 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover Mini. (94 Nm). This means 1964 Opel Rekord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover Mini.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Opel Rekord | 1998 Rover Mini | |
| Make | Opel | Rover |
| Model | Rekord | Mini |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 108 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 696 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |
