1964 Peugeot 404 vs. 1980 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1980 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Peugeot 404. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Peugeot 404 would be higher. At 1,946 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Peugeot 404 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda Cosmo (151 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Peugeot 404. (121 Nm). This means 1980 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Peugeot 404.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Peugeot 404 | 1980 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Peugeot | Mazda |
| Model | 404 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 88 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2520 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |
