1964 Peugeot 404 vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Peugeot 404. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Peugeot 404 would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Peugeot 404. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Peugeot 404. (121 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Peugeot 404.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Peugeot 404 | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Peugeot | Jeep |
| Model | 404 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1946 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4161 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2103 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2423 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |
