1964 Peugeot 404 vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Peugeot 404. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Peugeot 404 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (529 Nm) has 408 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Peugeot 404. (121 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Peugeot 404.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Peugeot 404 | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Peugeot | Ford |
Model | 404 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 414 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 529 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 61 L |