1964 Peugeot 404 vs. 2013 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2013 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Peugeot 404. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Peugeot 404 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Peugeot 404 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Peugeot 404. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Transit Connect, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Transit Connect (174 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Peugeot 404. (121 Nm). This means 2013 Ford Transit Connect will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Peugeot 404.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Peugeot 404 | 2013 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Peugeot | Ford |
Model | 404 | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 1964 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1946 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4587 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2113 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2014 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 56 L |