1964 Plymouth Valiant vs. 1951 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1964 Plymouth Valiant is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Mayflower.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Plymouth Valiant | 1951 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Plymouth | Triumph |
Model | Valiant | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1964 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2789 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2110 mm |