1964 Plymouth Valiant vs. 1982 Honda Ballade
To start off, 1982 Honda Ballade is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1982 Honda Ballade. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 1982 Honda Ballade.
Because 1964 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Honda Ballade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Plymouth Valiant | 1982 Honda Ballade | |
| Make | Plymouth | Honda |
| Model | Valiant | Ballade |
| Year Released | 1964 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2789 cc | 1335 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2330 mm |
