1964 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2001 Porsche 996

To start off, 2001 Porsche 996 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,596 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Porsche 996 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Porsche 996 (317 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Porsche 996 should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.

Because 2001 Porsche 996 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Porsche 996 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Plymouth Valiant 2001 Porsche 996
Make Plymouth Porsche
Model Valiant 996
Year Released 1964 2001
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2789 cc 3596 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 317 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2360 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]