1964 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Rover 75 (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.
Because 1964 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1964 Plymouth Valiant | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Plymouth | Rover |
Model | Valiant | 75 |
Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2789 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2750 mm |