1964 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. (74 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1964 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1964 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Plymouth Valiant | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Plymouth | Volkswagen |
| Model | Valiant | Polo |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2789 cc | 1422 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2470 mm |
