1964 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2009 Porsche 911

To start off, 2009 Porsche 911 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Porsche 911 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Porsche 911 (341 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Porsche 911 should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.

Because 2009 Porsche 911 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Porsche 911 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1964 Plymouth Valiant 2009 Porsche 911
Make Plymouth Porsche
Model Valiant 911
Year Released 1964 2009
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2789 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Horse Power 100 HP 341 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1310 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1860 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2360 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]