1964 Plymouth Valiant vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (237 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1964 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1964 Plymouth Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1964 Plymouth Valiant | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Plymouth | Jaguar |
| Model | Valiant | XF |
| Year Released | 1964 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2789 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 237 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2908 mm |
